I certainly meet the cut-off, yet I am not the hot type that would get their panties wet. Moreover, the 1-to-10 rankings are unreliable, because unless the criteria for the rankings are rigorously and scientifically, or at least objectively, specified, the yardsticks employed by whoever is doing the rating, e. Debateable flaw- Something that is too subjective to call a true flaw to some and may even be a redeemable feature to another. And people in the industry say he is pretty much the best looking guy they have ever seen. This is what probably the most popular kid from your high school was. In the social sciences, common examples are the Likert scale and 1-10 rating scales in which a person selects the number which is considered to reflect the perceived quality of a product.
For example: A Turns heads of men 20 years older, turns heads of men 10 years older, turns heads of men in own age group, turns heads of men younger. This resulted in me turning down lots of great, cute girls and led to me marrying a hot but dominant wife. There are softwares out there with a pretty high success rate that can take a plain face and make it look prettier to most users, using some math formula. Tip: Use the to best portray a number scale, with more than 10 intervals. Did I , no, but that urge was real.
Spending time and effort on makeup doesn't mean you are spending that time correctly, or making yourself look your best. This scale will feature what the average person looks like for each ranking. I instinctively filter out men who are 6+ physically anyway, i don't even bother trying with them and they don't approach me. But is a little light ass spanking sick, if both parties enjoy it? In other words, 1-10 scale itself seems to be subjective. Some of the guys here think anyone over 30 is an old hag.
Being a 9 is not only about being extremely good looking, but also having almost perfect features in every other way. Not by dealing with the women themselves or really having any concern whatsoever for their opinions on the matter. Anything less than a 9 is basically the same as a zero. You could see a distribution of the votes for the person you were pretending to be and the distribution did not change. The question is where you have your cut-off point. You don't even want to look at them. It is basically like getting a perfect canvas, but having no artwork on it.
When I grew up in Norcal, I thought that the 7s that I mentioned above were like 9s or 10s. Can you post an example of woman of average height who you think is a 9 or 10. Also there is a phenomenon of going up or down a point by doing small things. This error, will in turn, make it difficult to qualify what opinion the resulting data truly represents. Pain Level 7 Very Intense Pain Same as 6 except the pain completely dominates your senses, causing you to think unclearly about half the time. She has a few redeeming features, cannot compete with her good looking friends but she can still get a date. Additionally, we had talked about marriage, and she said she was a firm believer in prenups etc.
This is how it is: 1- Hideous. And I also got 4 dates out of 40 approaches and making out with one girl, but she was very need for it. The 1-10 scale must be a mostly male description I agree completely. Then there will be no question and everyone and you can all feel secure in your status and know what to do to get more badges. Most guys are going to agree on what an average looking woman looks like. When you are in pain, doctors may ask you to rate your pain from 1 to 10. My Committee Chair, who has been reviewing thesis submissions for years, was impressed by your analytical, data handling, and publishing tools.
I just try to deflect. The of attractiveness is a rating system of a person's physical appearance. Almost all readers thousands came up with virtually the same ranking of the ten. Females: I tried to use pictures with no makeup because makeup can turn a 6 Kourtney Kardashian into a 10 if they have the right face for it. I'd redefine my personal scale's numbers as following.
They conducted a study to look at the relationship between scale length and its reliability with 706 tests from thirty different studies. Instead of a 1 to 10 scale, these men use two categories, yes or no. You can have literally unlimited number of response choices, and even add pictures to your Likert Scale questions. I still think a lot of guys rate women 10 from what they have potential to be, not what they are. Of course, there will always be subjectivity based on how generous respondents are on each word scale, but at the very least, it provides a direct connection between the respondent and researcher on the meaning of each score. She is generally regarded as the best female model in all of fashion.
They're on the red carpet. It is basically like getting a perfect canvas, but having no artwork on it. Look at pictures of Candice Swanepoel. Does any of this have anything to do with monogamy, not in this discussion. The sweet friend or girl next door. Interestingly, most girls would probably rate themselves around a 6 or 7 as well. In SoCal there are a lot of 7s and above.
And as you say, men have different preferences, nobody will be a 10 to everybody. Each person has to draw their own line. On a more relevant note, I think you're totally overestimating the size of boobs with regards to attention and attractiveness. Normally, the minimum precision used is a half-point 0. The basic problem is that guys lose their objectivity and rate a girl they have been with absurdly high while others will be shitlords and rate a posted pic absurdly low whether directly due to a loss of objectivity or just being crabs in a bucket.